IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ctwqxx/v33y2012i7p1231-1247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Turning Governance Thinking Upside-down? Insights from ‘the politics of what works’

Author

Listed:
  • Sam Hickey

Abstract

Mainstream thinking within international development around what constitutes ‘pro-poor’ forms of politics is increasingly at odds with the growing evidence-base on the politics of development. Ideological bias towards Weberian modes of governance and rational actor models of political behaviour, and a growing belief in the power of ‘evidence-based policy making’ fail to reflect the extent to which informal and patronage-based forms can sometimes play a positive role in enabling poverty reduction, as well as the fact that political elites respond to a wider range of incentives than commonly assumed, including a role for political ideology and discourse rather than evidence per se. These findings offer further support for a fundamental rethinking around the role of politics in shaping development.

Suggested Citation

  • Sam Hickey, 2012. "Turning Governance Thinking Upside-down? Insights from ‘the politics of what works’," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 1231-1247.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:33:y:2012:i:7:p:1231-1247
    DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2012.695516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01436597.2012.695516
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01436597.2012.695516?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sam Hickey & Badru Bukenya, 2016. "The politics of promoting social cash transfers in Uganda," WIDER Working Paper Series 118, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. Abdul-Gafaru Abdulai, 2014. "Rethinking spatial inequalities in development: the primacy of politics and power relations," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-029-14, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    3. Sam Hickey & Badru Bukenya, 2016. "The politics of promoting social cash transfers in Uganda," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2016-118, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:33:y:2012:i:7:p:1231-1247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ctwq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.