IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cpprxx/v40y2025i6p1356-1383.html

Evaluating mandated intermunicipal collaboration in Alberta, Canada, through the lens of Institutional Collective Action

Author

Listed:
  • Sandeep Agrawal
  • Cody Gretzinger

Abstract

Alberta’s mandatory Intermunicipal Collaboration Frameworks (ICFs) are agreements meant to help plan, deliver, and fund intermunicipal services. This study, using an Institutional Collective Action lens, assesses their effectiveness. We find that ICFs can foster trust and reduce defection risk, but collaboration remains uneven across service agreements, principles, and joint committees. Key challenges include unsatisfactory resolutions via arbitration and differing preferences for services, and how municipalities align financial reporting methods and service standards. Despite tensions, ICFs offer flexibility and promote sustained regional collaboration. Improving legislation and strengthening institutional support and municipal incentives could further enhance the effectiveness of ICFs.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandeep Agrawal & Cody Gretzinger, 2025. "Evaluating mandated intermunicipal collaboration in Alberta, Canada, through the lens of Institutional Collective Action," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 1356-1383, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:40:y:2025:i:6:p:1356-1383
    DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2025.2574634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02697459.2025.2574634
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02697459.2025.2574634?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:40:y:2025:i:6:p:1356-1383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cppr20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.