IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cpprxx/v40y2025i4p802-822.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Before the plot ratio: balancing density through ambiguity in 1950s colonial Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Junwei Li
  • Mark Hansley Yang Chua
  • Kar Him Mo

Abstract

This research examines density regulation in the 1950s Hong Kong that influenced urban planning and policymaking, highlighting the contentious legal concept of ‘one house’ within the leasehold system under colonial land administrations. Utilising archival research and Coasian theory, we elucidate the extralegal treatment of the ambiguous ‘one house’ concept, intended to minimise transaction costs and balance the benefits and harms of high density. This extralegality spurred new housing designs and rent-seeking by private builders. As densification increased, ambiguity in land lease control and case-by-case considerations increased transaction costs, prompting the adoption of universal density control regulations – the forerunners of the Plot Ratio.

Suggested Citation

  • Junwei Li & Mark Hansley Yang Chua & Kar Him Mo, 2025. "Before the plot ratio: balancing density through ambiguity in 1950s colonial Hong Kong," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 802-822, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:40:y:2025:i:4:p:802-822
    DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2025.2489220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02697459.2025.2489220
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02697459.2025.2489220?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:40:y:2025:i:4:p:802-822. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cppr20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.