IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cpprxx/v40y2025i3p645-672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Best practice’ for healthy urban development: learning from others while maintaining local responsiveness in an emerging planning specialism

Author

Listed:
  • Helen Pineo
  • Gemma Moore
  • Karla Barrantes Chaves
  • Elizabeth Cooper
  • Vafa Dianati
  • Isobel Braithwaite

Abstract

Lack of clarity about what ‘healthy’ urban development means, alongside financial and technical challenges, has slowed progress on health-promoting development. Case studies could support learning, however, scholars have been critical of their risks when they are applied without adequate consideration of required adaptations or alternatives. We explored how health is promoted through new development via a narrative synthesis of published cases and critically evaluated their value. Cases more frequently achieved sustainability goals than equity and inclusion goals. We conclude that case studies have particular value when shared in a manner that encourages critical examination and discussion, such as through storytelling.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen Pineo & Gemma Moore & Karla Barrantes Chaves & Elizabeth Cooper & Vafa Dianati & Isobel Braithwaite, 2025. "‘Best practice’ for healthy urban development: learning from others while maintaining local responsiveness in an emerging planning specialism," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 645-672, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:40:y:2025:i:3:p:645-672
    DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2025.2475628
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02697459.2025.2475628
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02697459.2025.2475628?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:40:y:2025:i:3:p:645-672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cppr20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.