IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cpprxx/v39y2024i2p277-305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The roles and ethical perspectives of urban planners in Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Cihan Mert Sabah
  • Aliye Ahu Gülümser

Abstract

This study examines the influence of ethical rules on Turkish planners’ ability to carry out their duties. Researchers used qualitative and quantitative methods, including a survey with hypothetical scenarios and prioritization tests, to measure ethical preferences. Findings indicate that planners in Turkey make ethically inappropriate choices in providing information outside their field of expertise and publishing information on demand. However, their responsibility to the public and public interest principle come to the forefront in planners’ ethical preferences. Planners preferred deontological ethics in performing their professional duties, but also preferred more political and hybrid roles.

Suggested Citation

  • Cihan Mert Sabah & Aliye Ahu Gülümser, 2024. "The roles and ethical perspectives of urban planners in Turkey," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 277-305, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:39:y:2024:i:2:p:277-305
    DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2023.2230019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02697459.2023.2230019
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02697459.2023.2230019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:39:y:2024:i:2:p:277-305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cppr20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.