IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cpprxx/v37y2022i4p509-525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theory versus Practice in Planning Education: The View from South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • S. P. Denoon-Stevens
  • L. Andres
  • P. Jones
  • L. Melgaço
  • R. Massey
  • V. Nel

Abstract

This paper reflects on the ongoing debate between theory and practice in planning, using the example of South Africa. Based on survey responses, it discusses how planning education in South Africa is perceived to prepare students for practice. While we acknowledge that the majority of respondents view their planning education positively, the results reveal challenges regarding the practical application of theory, especially in the case of land-use management. We then respond to calls for contextualised practices of knowing, emphasising the ‘local’ in planning education so that theory and practice can be combined across contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • S. P. Denoon-Stevens & L. Andres & P. Jones & L. Melgaço & R. Massey & V. Nel, 2022. "Theory versus Practice in Planning Education: The View from South Africa," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 509-525, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:37:y:2022:i:4:p:509-525
    DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2020.1735158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02697459.2020.1735158
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02697459.2020.1735158?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:37:y:2022:i:4:p:509-525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cppr20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.