IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cpprxx/v37y2022i1p13-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implications of the Covid-19 Pandemic: Canvassing Opinion from Planning Professionals

Author

Listed:
  • Julian Bolleter
  • Nicole Edwards
  • Robert Cameron
  • Anthony Duckworth
  • Robert Freestone
  • Sarah Foster
  • Paula Hooper

Abstract

By the end of 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic had exceeded 83 million cases worldwide. Given the shared origins of planning and public health, new living and social conditions have prompted an interest in how urban planning could respond to the pandemic’s associated implications. In 2020, a national online survey Plan My Australia was conducted among planning experts (n = 161), in part, to identify new challenges facing urban planning and design due to the pandemic. The findings reported here revealed that many experts identified better planning for future pandemics in Australia could require some reconsideration of city size, urban density, self-sufficiency, public transport use, open space provision and housing design.

Suggested Citation

  • Julian Bolleter & Nicole Edwards & Robert Cameron & Anthony Duckworth & Robert Freestone & Sarah Foster & Paula Hooper, 2022. "Implications of the Covid-19 Pandemic: Canvassing Opinion from Planning Professionals," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 13-34, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:37:y:2022:i:1:p:13-34
    DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2021.1905991
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02697459.2021.1905991
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02697459.2021.1905991?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:37:y:2022:i:1:p:13-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cppr20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.