IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cpprxx/v35y2020i3p349-362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Demystifying Academic Writing in the Doctoral Program: Writing Workshops, Peer Reviews, and Scholarly Identities

Author

Listed:
  • Bjørn Sletto
  • Kristine Stiphany
  • Jane Futrell Winslow
  • Andrea Roberts
  • Marla Torrado
  • Alejandra Reyes
  • Ariadna Reyes
  • Juan Yunda
  • Christina Wirsching
  • Kwangyul Choi
  • Kristina Tajchman

Abstract

This article discusses a course at The University of Texas at Austinwhich sought to facilitate doctoral students’ development of scholarly articles while simultaneously fostering their sense of scholarly identity. The article was co-authored by the instructor and two cohorts of doctoral students based on immediate as well as retrospective learning outcome assessments. The social constructivist approach to writing pedagogy fostered students’ scholarly identities and demystified the publication process. However, efforts should be made to maintain the practice of writing, sharing, and reviewing and the course should more explicitly foster critical reflections on the relationship between writing, scholarly identity, and knowledge production.

Suggested Citation

  • Bjørn Sletto & Kristine Stiphany & Jane Futrell Winslow & Andrea Roberts & Marla Torrado & Alejandra Reyes & Ariadna Reyes & Juan Yunda & Christina Wirsching & Kwangyul Choi & Kristina Tajchman, 2020. "Demystifying Academic Writing in the Doctoral Program: Writing Workshops, Peer Reviews, and Scholarly Identities," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 349-362, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:35:y:2020:i:3:p:349-362
    DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2020.1748331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02697459.2020.1748331
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02697459.2020.1748331?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:35:y:2020:i:3:p:349-362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cppr20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.