IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cposxx/v46y2025i6p939-956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opposition windows in Delhi’s water utility privatization: going beyond the multiple streams framework

Author

Listed:
  • Ashok Kumar
  • Nitin Singh
  • Anna Mdee
  • Shivani Singhal
  • Jaime Amezaga

Abstract

John Kingdon’s Multi-Stream Framework sheds light on the foundational conditions under which public policies get formulated and implemented. The coupling of the Problem, Policy, and Politics streams along with efforts by Policy Entrepreneurs opens the Opportunity Window for policy realization. Interpreting Kingdon’s MSF, a rich scholarship exists, which found evidence in support of this framework. Some instances of the opening up of multiple windows are found in MSF. However, two aspects remain unclear. First, what happens when multiple windows open, some of them could be opened by the opposing side simultaneously to the policy window? Second, no literature exists that discusses the application of multiple windows of the MSF. In this context, this paper takes the idea of multiple windows seriously along with illustrations from Delhi, India where we find that although a window of opportunity existed for the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi, it could not privatize water supply. Our argument is that multiple windows opened up, some by the opposition that thwarted water privatization attempts of the state government.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashok Kumar & Nitin Singh & Anna Mdee & Shivani Singhal & Jaime Amezaga, 2025. "Opposition windows in Delhi’s water utility privatization: going beyond the multiple streams framework," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(6), pages 939-956, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:46:y:2025:i:6:p:939-956
    DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2024.2393665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01442872.2024.2393665
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01442872.2024.2393665?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:46:y:2025:i:6:p:939-956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cpos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.