IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cposxx/v46y2025i4p560-581.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptualizing decent work: an explorative study of decent work in England’s Midlands region

Author

Listed:
  • Tony Dobbins
  • Xuebing Cao
  • Anne Green
  • Paul Johnstone
  • Will Foster

Abstract

Despite an increased focus on the quality as well as quantity of work, conceptualization of decent work remains underdeveloped. There is no single agreed definition of decent work. The International Labour Organization provides an overarching definition of decent work as “productive work for women and men in conditions of freedom, equity, security and human dignity”. This article contributes to conceptual advancement of decent work by compiling a new holistic framework comprising dimensions of decent work, distributive and contributive justice, hard and soft policy regulation, and levels of decent work. Its main aim is to evaluate the suitability of this new conceptual framework for exploring the prognosis on decent work – mainly as a means for informing policy interventions. This is done by applying the framework empirically through analyzing evidence collected in the context of the UK’s Midlands region using qualitative research methods, including interviews capturing perspectives from various stakeholders. Limited sub-national devolved policy levers are identified, exacerbated by limited hard regulations nationally supporting decent work/workers’ rights.

Suggested Citation

  • Tony Dobbins & Xuebing Cao & Anne Green & Paul Johnstone & Will Foster, 2025. "Conceptualizing decent work: an explorative study of decent work in England’s Midlands region," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(4), pages 560-581, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:46:y:2025:i:4:p:560-581
    DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2024.2353068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01442872.2024.2353068
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01442872.2024.2353068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:46:y:2025:i:4:p:560-581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cpos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.