IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cposxx/v36y2015i3p345-358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision networks and quasi-citizens: who deliberates, where?

Author

Listed:
  • Douglas A. Chalmers

Abstract

This article argues that the focus on deliberative politics in a state polity reveals two often overlooked facts about where politics takes place and who is participating in it. Recognition of these facts suggests the polity is more adaptable to new situations than usually conceived and suggest unusual and demanding requirements for democracy. The article suggest considering two important elements of democratic politics: decision networks, and quasi-citizens. (1) Decision networks are composed of networks of stakeholders, experts and authoritative decision-makers. Deliberative democracy depends heavily on what happens in these ad hoc decision networks. (2) Quasi-citizens: the people whose interests and perspectives count in a democracy is not a single group defined by citizenship. Deliberation frequently involves non-citizens not just as objects of policy, but as individuals and groups whose interests and interactions have to be taken into account – that is, are represented – in the process of making law and policy. Like citizens, their cooperation and judgment that state actions are legitimate are often required for law or policy to be effective. The article suggests changing the norm of rule by ‘the people’ to rule by ‘all those affected’.

Suggested Citation

  • Douglas A. Chalmers, 2015. "Decision networks and quasi-citizens: who deliberates, where?," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 345-358, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:36:y:2015:i:3:p:345-358
    DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2015.1065963
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01442872.2015.1065963
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01442872.2015.1065963?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:36:y:2015:i:3:p:345-358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cpos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.