IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cposxx/v35y2014i1p1-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participatory evaluation: a useful tool for contextualising cluster policy?

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Aragon
  • Mari Jose Aranguren
  • Maria-Angeles Diez
  • Cristina Iturrioz
  • James R. Wilson

Abstract

Insufficient attention is often given to the underlying context in which policies that seek to facilitate cooperation between firms are implemented, inhibiting their expected outcomes. This article analyses the processes involved in a participatory cluster policy evaluation experience that was designed to integrate fundamental and ongoing concern with context and how it interacts with the policy. The premise of the argument is that participatory evaluation itself can directly support the aims of the policy (cluster cooperation) and contribute to policy learning. Nevertheless, we find that success is not guaranteed; several obstacles have to be overcome to obtain learning outcomes that strengthen policy-making. While the contribution is primarily methodological, the article also contributes to conceptual debates on the significance of cluster context in policy design, implementation and evaluation. The participatory evaluation process explored in the article, alongside the findings around key practical considerations, can be usefully applied in other policy contexts that aim to enhance cooperation between firms and other economic agents.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Aragon & Mari Jose Aranguren & Maria-Angeles Diez & Cristina Iturrioz & James R. Wilson, 2014. "Participatory evaluation: a useful tool for contextualising cluster policy?," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 1-21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:35:y:2014:i:1:p:1-21
    DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2013.803532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01442872.2013.803532
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01442872.2013.803532?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:35:y:2014:i:1:p:1-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cpos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.