IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cposxx/v25y2004i3p189-207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does more evidence lead to better policy?

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Tenbensel

Abstract

Does more evidence lead to better policy or might it lead to incoherence between the implications of different sources of evidence? This article raises the issue of the commensurability of different sources of evidence gathered in relation to a single, broad policy area, namely health prioritisation in New Zealand during the 1990s. In this case, different government agencies, all committed to gathering better evidence for policy on this issue, each gathered evidence leading to quite different policy implications. The article argues that working out how to handle divergent evidence is at least as important a task as gathering more evidence.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Tenbensel, 2004. "Does more evidence lead to better policy?," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 189-207.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:25:y:2004:i:3:p:189-207
    DOI: 10.1080/0144287012000277480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144287012000277480
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144287012000277480?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:25:y:2004:i:3:p:189-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cpos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.