IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cposxx/v24y2003i4p227-242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The case of the Leeds Transport Strategy

Author

Listed:
  • E. Barrett
  • M. Heycock
  • D. Hick
  • E. Judge

Abstract

While the transport problems of disabled people figure prominently in some transport strategies, the reality of what disabled people experience can be far removed from what most strategies aim to achieve. The main reason for this mismatch is an inappropriate, even erroneous, conceptualisation of disability. This is compounded by an inadequate articulation of the needs of disabled people and their lack of meaningful involvement in the development of transport strategy. These issues arise in many strategies and this paper will look at their occurrence in one of the more well-known strategies, the Leeds Transport Strategy (as currently expressed within the West Yorkshire Local Transport Plan). The paper analyses the treatment of disabled access issues in the strategy and relates these issues to the results of empirical research. The experiences of a wide range of disabled respondents are considered in parallel with the attitudes and actions of transport providers and policy makers. The paper concludes that the gap between intentions of policy makers and the real needs of disabled transport users, can be reduced by the involvement of disabled people in the decision-making process.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Barrett & M. Heycock & D. Hick & E. Judge, 2003. "The case of the Leeds Transport Strategy," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 227-242.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:24:y:2003:i:4:p:227-242
    DOI: 10.1080/0144287042000216090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144287042000216090
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144287042000216090?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:24:y:2003:i:4:p:227-242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cpos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.