IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cposxx/v24y2003i4p163-186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use, satisfaction and the influence of local governance regime

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Bennett
  • Paul Robson

Abstract

This paper compares the performance of English Business Link (BL) with Scotland’s Small Business Gateway and Wales’ Business Connect. Within England it compares BLs that are independent with those that are de facto subsidiaries of chambers of commerce or other organisations. Using 2002 large-scale survey data, the paper shows that BL has become the dominant public source of advice in England, with the RDAs and LSCs yet to make any impact. Market penetration, impact and satisfaction have all increased compared with 1997 survey results, but much of this increase is due to BLs that are subsidiaries, particularly those that are subsidiaries of chambers of commerce. In Scotland and Wales, a national–local system has emerged that achieves similar performance but with greater emphasis on brokerage and referrals. Assessment of BL fee regimes shows that fee charging is uncorrelated with client satisfaction. The government’s Skills Strategy has emerged to be a potential danger to BL performance if it shifts the emphasis away from a focus on client needs towards meeting government skill targets.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Bennett & Paul Robson, 2003. "Use, satisfaction and the influence of local governance regime," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 163-186.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:24:y:2003:i:4:p:163-186
    DOI: 10.1080/0144287042000216126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144287042000216126
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144287042000216126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:24:y:2003:i:4:p:163-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cpos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.