IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cposxx/v24y2003i1p51-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equal Access to Health Care and the British National Health Service

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Powell
  • Mark Exworthy

Abstract

Equal access to health care is a central objective of many health care systems, and is often seen as the founding principle of the British National Health Service. However, this paper argues that it can be seen as a piece of grand or flamboyant rhetoric of symbolic politics, representing a misreading, or at least an oversimplification, of history. It examines stated equity objectives in the NHS by placing them in the cells of an equity matrix. It is discovered that few NHS policies have aimed to achieve 'equal access to health care' in any meaningful sense. Policies in the 'old NHS' were largely concerned with equality of provision, with some later moves towards equal expenditure for equal need. The 'new NHS' of the New Labour government stress both fair access and a more ambitious aim of reducing the health gap. Moreover, this rhetorical emphasis has obscured wider issues, in that little attention has been paid to issues such as which variations are unacceptable, how much variation should be tolerated, and the potential trade-offs between concepts such as equity and efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Powell & Mark Exworthy, 2003. "Equal Access to Health Care and the British National Health Service," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 51-64.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:24:y:2003:i:1:p:51-64
    DOI: 10.1080/01442870308038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01442870308038
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01442870308038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:24:y:2003:i:1:p:51-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cpos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.