IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cposxx/v23y2002i2p77-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated Care and Structural Change in England: The Case of Care Trusts

Author

Listed:
  • Bob Hudson

Abstract

Integrated care for vulnerable people is a target of governments throughout the world, but one that is thwarted by organizational and professional divisions. The 'New Labour' government in Britain came to power in 1997 with a brief to secure integrated support across health and social care through the development of partnership working - part of its much-vaunted 'Third Way'. However, just as new legislation on partnerships came into effect, the government attempted a volte-face and sought an alternative policy - the imposition of structural change. This article looks at the origin and nature of these alternative approaches. The political furore accompanying the change is examined and an attempt is made to apply an evidence-based approach to the main vehicle for structural change - Care Trusts. Ten reasons are suggested for treating the proposed model with caution. The analysis has relevance for the debate elsewhere between the relative merits of partnership working and structural integration as alternative ways of securing integrated care.

Suggested Citation

  • Bob Hudson, 2002. "Integrated Care and Structural Change in England: The Case of Care Trusts," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 77-95.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:23:y:2002:i:2:p:77-95
    DOI: 10.1080/0144287022000011459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144287022000011459
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144287022000011459?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:23:y:2002:i:2:p:77-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cpos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.