Author
Listed:
- Jeffrey Boon Hui Yap
- Zi Yin Tan
- Martin Skitmore
- Siaw Chuing Loo
- Felicia Yan Yan Yong
Abstract
Green procurement (GP) is increasingly recognized as a strategic mechanism for embedding sustainability within the construction industry (CI), yet its adoption in developing economies remains inconsistent and uneven. This study investigates the key drivers shaping GP adoption in Malaysia’s CI and uncovers the underlying factors that explain variations in stakeholder behaviour. Drawing on Institutional Theory (IT) and the Resource-Based View (RBV), twenty-one GP drivers were identified through a comprehensive literature review and evaluated using a structured questionnaire administered to developers, consultants, and contractors. Quantitative analyses—including descriptive statistics, Kruskal–Wallis tests, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA)—revealed four interrelated dimensions: Institutional and Strategic Support, Market and Business Competitiveness, Availability of Green Resources and Infrastructure, and Stakeholder Engagement and Social Responsibility. These dimensions form the basis of the Integrated Institutional–Capability Framework for Green Procurement (IICF-GP), which explains how external institutional pressures interact with internal organizational capabilities to influence both strategic intent and operational implementation of GP. The framework contributes theoretically by integrating IT and RBV within a single empirically grounded explanatory model, and practically by identifying targeted policy, capability-building, and supply-chain levers. Findings underscore that regulatory clarity, supplier readiness, technological capability, and stakeholder collaboration are critical to advancing GP in developing-country construction contexts.
Suggested Citation
Jeffrey Boon Hui Yap & Zi Yin Tan & Martin Skitmore & Siaw Chuing Loo & Felicia Yan Yan Yong, 2026.
"Unmasking green procurement: What drives adoption in developing-country construction?,"
Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(5), pages 337-358, May.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:44:y:2026:i:5:p:337-358
DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2026.2634788
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:44:y:2026:i:5:p:337-358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.