Author
Listed:
- Guilherme Luiz Canzian Marion
- Tarcisio Abreu Saurin
- Daniela Dietz Viana
Abstract
Production planning and control (PP&C) in construction projects addresses a wide diversity of variabilities that must be matched by a corresponding wide diversity of controls. These diverse controls might be accounted for by the concept of slack practices and resources (SPR), an extension of the buffer concept. Decision-making on the allocation of SPR often occurs under time pressure and without monetary data, demanding a suitable analytical approach. This paper introduces a method for assessing the cost-benefit of SPR in PP&C in construction. The method includes a questionnaire designed to be answered by practitioners involved in the creation of SPR. It enables the assessment of the net benefit value of each SPR, which - along with other data (e.g. monetary costs, if available) and consideration of contextual factors - supports decision-making regarding resource allocation. The application of the method in a construction project revealed 15 SPR, 11 of which should be maintained as they were. This suggests that the unstructured decision-making by employees was often effective, though not always. The findings also led to five propositions that guide the method′s application, emphasizing the cost-benefit of opportunistic SPR, the different perspectives on SPR allocation, and the value of human-based slack.
Suggested Citation
Guilherme Luiz Canzian Marion & Tarcisio Abreu Saurin & Daniela Dietz Viana, 2025.
"The cost-benefit of slack in production planning and control in construction projects,"
Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(11), pages 883-900, November.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:43:y:2025:i:11:p:883-900
DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2025.2529505
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:43:y:2025:i:11:p:883-900. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.