IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v43y2025i10p823-848.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influencing factors of the government’s willingness to compensate in the early termination of PPP projects: based on multiple cases in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zujie Lu
  • Jicai Liu
  • Zehui Bu

Abstract

The Public-Private Partnership (PPP) projects often end in early termination. Investors usually fail to receive reasonable compensation from the government. The government’s willingness to compensate is crucial in the compensation process. This study aimed to clarify the factors influencing the government’s willingness to compensate and to identify the influential relationship between these factors. By selecting 18 cases of early termination of PPP projects, The key factors are identified using grounded theory. Finally, the influential relationship between the influencing factors is analyzed using Interpretative Structural Modelling (ISM), which transcribes the results and computing by SPSSAU. The results show that there are 12 major categories affecting the government’s willingness to compensate and distribute in the transmission chain with five levels. Among them, asset ownership, policy and regulation are the fundamental causes. Compensation scheme and negotiation factors are identified as direct causes. This study provides knowledge of the key factors affecting the government’s willingness to compensate. A three-tiered strategy is proposed to avoid transmitting these factors in the compensating process. Guiding the government to enhance its willingness to compensate, improve the efficiency of compensation and provides strategies for investors to obtain fair and reasonable compensation.

Suggested Citation

  • Zujie Lu & Jicai Liu & Zehui Bu, 2025. "Influencing factors of the government’s willingness to compensate in the early termination of PPP projects: based on multiple cases in China," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(10), pages 823-848, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:43:y:2025:i:10:p:823-848
    DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2025.2522275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01446193.2025.2522275
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446193.2025.2522275?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:43:y:2025:i:10:p:823-848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.