IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v39y2021i2p117-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Owners’ use of contract-based power in construction project transactions: restrictions from process specificity and uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Rui Wang
  • Wenxue Lu
  • Yuxin Wei

Abstract

Little is known about what restrictions make owners unable to use or give up using contract-based power in construction project transactions. To examine this issue, this research explores the effects of process specificity on owners’ contract design and power use during contract execution as well as the moderating role of uncertainty in these effects using empirical data from 327 construction project transactions in China. The results show that owners can use coercive and legitimate powers based on contractual control while using reward and legitimate powers based on contractual coordination. The increase in process specificity (a special version of asset specificity in construction project transactions) encourages owners to intensify ex ante contract design while restricting their ex post coercive power use based on contractual control. Behavioural uncertainty weakens owners’ tendency to intensify contractual control with increasing process specificity, restricting their contractual-control-based power use. However, task uncertainty strengthens (rather than restricts) owners’ tendency to intensify contract design and power use when process specificity increases. These findings can help practitioners understand how the attributes of construction project transactions are related to transaction costs to affect owners’ contract-based power use, thereby avoiding ineffective power use.

Suggested Citation

  • Rui Wang & Wenxue Lu & Yuxin Wei, 2021. "Owners’ use of contract-based power in construction project transactions: restrictions from process specificity and uncertainty," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 117-132, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:39:y:2021:i:2:p:117-132
    DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2020.1830423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01446193.2020.1830423
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446193.2020.1830423?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:39:y:2021:i:2:p:117-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.