IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v32y2014i10p957-967.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Japanese competitive bid entry qualifications: an examination of public works

Author

Listed:
  • Yukiko Konno

Abstract

This study summarises the independent competitive bid entry qualifications examination of public works in Japan. Contractors who wish to undertake public works must be scored by a nationwide standardised objective examination called Keiei Jikou Sinsa or Keisin in Japanese. They must be graded on the basis of the score of not only the objective examination but also an independent assessment by the orderers. This study explains the calculation of Keisin using a virtual contractor. This study also discusses the effectiveness of Keisin and the efficiency of the grading system. Keisin is used not only for bid entry qualifications in public works, but also to evaluate construction companies by the orderers of private works and financial institutions. Additionally, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism uses Keisin to promote subscription to social insurance and thus contribute to improve workers' lifelong protection. The Japanese grading system in public bids underpins competitive bidding among firms of similar scale and capability, while providing opportunities for SMEs in every industry class to obtain construction contracts as prime contractors.

Suggested Citation

  • Yukiko Konno, 2014. "Japanese competitive bid entry qualifications: an examination of public works," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(10), pages 957-967, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:32:y:2014:i:10:p:957-967
    DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2014.948465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01446193.2014.948465
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446193.2014.948465?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:32:y:2014:i:10:p:957-967. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.