IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v31y2013i12p1199-1214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical success factors for enterprise risk management in Chinese construction companies

Author

Listed:
  • Xianbo Zhao
  • Bon-Gang Hwang
  • Sui Pheng Low

Abstract

Construction businesses are risky ventures and enterprise risk management (ERM) has been advocated in construction companies. To ensure ERM success and the subsequent benefits, it is necessary to understand the key activities of ERM. The objectives are to identify the critical success factors (CSFs) for ERM and analyse the interrelationships among these CSFs in Chinese construction companies (CCCs). To achieve this objective, 16 CSFs were identified through a comprehensive literature review and 89 completed survey questionnaires were received. The results of the analysis show that the three most important CSFs are 'commitment of the board and senior management', 'risk identification, analysis and response' and 'objective setting'. Additionally, the three underlying CSF groupings are (1) execution and integration; (2) communication and understanding; and (3) commitment and involvement of top management. The commitment and involvement of top management positively contributed to the communication and understanding as well as the execution and integration of ERM, while the communication and understanding facilitated the execution and integration of ERM. The proposed framework indicating the key ERM practices and the inter-grouping relationships provides an in-depth understanding of ERM in CCCs, compared with the existing not so relevant ERM frameworks in various other industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Xianbo Zhao & Bon-Gang Hwang & Sui Pheng Low, 2013. "Critical success factors for enterprise risk management in Chinese construction companies," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(12), pages 1199-1214, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:31:y:2013:i:12:p:1199-1214
    DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2013.867521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01446193.2013.867521
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446193.2013.867521?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jean-Charles Fiolet & Carl Haas & Keith Hipel, 2016. "Risk-chasing behaviour in on-site construction decisions," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(12), pages 845-858, December.
    2. Hong Xue & Shoujian Zhang & Yikun Su & Zezhou Wu, 2018. "Capital Cost Optimization for Prefabrication: A Factor Analysis Evaluation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Long Li & Zhongfu Li & Guangdong Wu & Xiaodan Li, 2018. "Critical Success Factors for Project Planning and Control in Prefabrication Housing Production: A China Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    4. José Giménez & Antonia Madrid-Guijarro & Antonio Duréndez, 2019. "Competitive Capabilities for the Innovation and Performance of Spanish Construction Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-24, October.
    5. Bon-Gang Hwang & Yu-Shan Li & Ming Shan & Jia-En Chua, 2020. "Prioritizing Critical Management Strategies to Improving Construction Productivity: Empirical Research in Singapore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-23, November.
    6. Yajing Zhang & Jingfeng Yuan & Lingzhi Li & Hu Cheng, 2019. "Proposing a Value Field Model for Predicting Homebuyers’ Purchasing Behavior of Green Residential Buildings: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-31, December.
    7. Junwei Zheng & Guangdong Wu, 2018. "Work-Family Conflict, Perceived Organizational Support and Professional Commitment: A Mediation Mechanism for Chinese Project Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-23, February.
    8. Zezhou Wu & Mingyang Jiang & Yuzhu Cai & Hao Wang & Shenghan Li, 2019. "What Hinders the Development of Green Building? An Investigation of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Guangdong Wu & Yue Wu & Hongyang Li & Chenglong Dan, 2018. "Job Burnout, Work-Family Conflict and Project Performance for Construction Professionals: The Moderating Role of Organizational Support," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Gabriela Fernandes & Joana Domingues & Anabela Tereso & Camilo Micán & Madalena Araújo, 2022. "Risk Management in University–Industry R&D Collaboration Programs: A Stakeholder Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Iwona Gorzeń-Mitka & Monika Wieczorek-Kosmala, 2023. "Mapping the Energy Sector from a Risk Management Research Perspective: A Bibliometric and Scientific Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-32, February.
    12. Hui Liu & Jie Li & Hongyang Li & He Li & Peng Mao & Jingfeng Yuan, 2021. "Risk Perception and Coping Behavior of Construction Workers on Occupational Health Risks—A Case Study of Nanjing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-25, July.
    13. Tengyuan Chang & Xiaopeng Deng & Bon-Gang Hwang, 2019. "Investigating Political Risk Paths in International High-Speed Railway Projects: The Case of Chinese International Contractors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-15, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:31:y:2013:i:12:p:1199-1214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.