Analysis of knowledge sharing behaviour in construction teams in Hong Kong
Knowledge sharing in construction teams is important for improved project performance and successful project delivery. The purpose of this study is to analyse psychological motivations underlying individual knowledge sharing behaviour in Hong Kong construction teams using the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). A questionnaire survey was conducted among professionals from 172 construction companies in Hong Kong. A total of 231 usable questionnaires were collected. Structural equation modelling (SEM) is applied to test the research model and hypotheses. The research results indicate that professionals’ knowledge sharing behaviour in construction teams is only significantly predicted by their intention to share knowledge rather than perceived behavioural control over knowledge sharing, implying that knowledge sharing behaviour is largely under the professionals’ volitional control. The research results also indicate that professionals’ knowledge sharing intention is dominantly affected by attitude and perceived behavioural control but weakly influenced by subjective norm, which is different from other groups of professionals in prior studies. Several managerial implications are suggested for construction companies to manage employees’ knowledge sharing behaviour in construction teams. It is one of the first studies to employ social psychological theory to examine knowledge sharing behaviour in the construction context. However, the research model only shows predictive power and lacks explanatory power. Nevertheless, it provides a starting point for future researchers to further explore the salient beliefs underlying attitude and perceived behavioural control so as to explain knowledge sharing behaviour in the construction sector.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 30 (2012)
Issue (Month): 7 (February)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RCME20|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:30:y:2012:i:7:p:557-574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.