IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Identifying the Pareto-front approximation for negotiations of BOT contracts with a multi-objective genetic algorithm

Listed author(s):
  • Fen-may Liou
  • Chien-hui Yang
  • Boarliang Chen
  • Weichi Chen
Registered author(s):

    The build-operate-transfer (BOT) project is formulated based upon cooperative partnerships among various public and private parties. Win-win negotiation solutions are especially essential for parties that usually have conflicts of interests. A simulation-based multi-objective genetic algorithm (SMOGA) procedure is developed to address conflicts among the objectives of three parties: government and consumer interests that focus on users' rights and social welfare; the private investor's pursuit of profit maximization; and lenders who want to control the solvency risk of the concessionaire. Taking the Kaohsiung cable car project in Taiwan as an example, the SMOGA procedure is used to seek terms and conditions lying on or near the Pareto frontier for BOT projects with multi-objectives. Monte Carlo simulation is conducted first to determine the project risks and generate the sample data used as the input of the genetic algorithm (GA). The GA subsequently generates a number of combinations of concessional terms and conditions that approximately and simultaneously optimize the three conflicting objectives. The GA-generated approximate Pareto frontier provides a decision space of financial and concessional terms and conditions that satisfies all parties and facilitates the negotiations of BOT contracts.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Construction Management and Economics.

    Volume (Year): 29 (2011)
    Issue (Month): 5 ()
    Pages: 535-548

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:29:y:2011:i:5:p:535-548
    DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2011.564196
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:29:y:2011:i:5:p:535-548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.