IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v25y2007i7p677-690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The principle of inconsistent trinity in the selection of procurement systems

Author

Listed:
  • Graham Ive
  • Chen-Yu Chang

Abstract

This paper examines the economic characteristics of construction procurement systems partially in terms of transaction cost economics and partly those of project management. It proposes the theoretical principle of an inconsistent trinity, according to which, in selecting a procurement system, the client will inevitably face a trade-off between the procurement system best able to deliver: (1) fastest completion of the project (and therefore higher discounted present value of revenue from the project); (2) least vulnerability when making changes (lower transaction hold-up costs arising from temporal or process specificity); as well as (3) least vulnerability to non-performance (lower transaction measurement costs from greater visibility to third parties for ordering of disputes). The model provides a potentially testable contribution to a transaction cost theory of construction procurement. It also has two implications: (1) the three main family types of procurement systems are held to be intrinsically different in economic terms, so selection of procurement system does matter; (2) no system can enjoy absolute advantage over others, so the proposed strategy of procurement system selection is to align the characteristics of procurement systems with attributes of projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Graham Ive & Chen-Yu Chang, 2007. "The principle of inconsistent trinity in the selection of procurement systems," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(7), pages 677-690.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:25:y:2007:i:7:p:677-690
    DOI: 10.1080/01446190601164089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01446190601164089
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:25:y:2007:i:7:p:677-690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.