Author
Abstract
The generation of a reliable early stage building project price forecast for its capital cost is an important aspect of any project's initial appraisal. Such professional advice is central to clients' decision-making processes. Work on early stage building project budget price forecasting is reviewed and a change in the direction of future research is called for in this topic area. This aim has been achieved by identifying seminal work on the general topic, addressing its shortcomings, and then focusing on research conducted to explore the formulation processes of quality building project budget price advice. It is posited that poor quality building project price forecasts affect clients seeking to make value for money business decisions. Empirical evidence from previous research indicates that previous calls for paradigm changes in practice towards the adoption of newer more stochastic models or tools such as expert systems, probabilistic and regression models have now been generally rejected. As a result it is asserted that practice can be considered to be in crisis and is looking to establish a new way forward. It is concluded that a research agenda needs to be established that has process standardisation and practitioner judgement as well as the existing information engineering-based approach at its core. Such an additional strand to future research in the topic area will help to ensure that the newly emerging wave of project budget formulation tools, such as neural nets, neuro-fuzzy nets, sustainability and whole life cost models are taken up and used more effectively in practice.
Suggested Citation
Chris Fortune, 2006.
"Process standardisation and the impact of professional judgement on the formulation of building project budget price advice,"
Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(10), pages 1091-1098.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:24:y:2006:i:10:p:1091-1098
DOI: 10.1080/01446190600851116
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:24:y:2006:i:10:p:1091-1098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.