Author
Listed:
- Nick Blismas
- William Sher
- Antony Thorpe
- Andrew Baldwin
Abstract
Construction management research and practice is dominated by a single project paradigm. This does not reflect the true nature of many construction clients who have large multi-project portfolios. Traditional single project management strategies are usually adopted for managing such portfolios - with limited success. The literature suggests that programmes, within portfolios, require different forms of management in order to optimize project delivery. In order to better understand these portfolios and thereby allow the exploration of new forms of management, a typology has been developed mapping out the various features of client's construction portfolios. The resultant typology provides a simple method for identifying the programme composition of a portfolio, highlighting the expected features of each programme type, and thereby directing management attention to the main aspects of each programme that can be optimized for efficiency. Six cases of client's construction project portfolios were studied using a highly structured, replication logic, case study methodology. A typology of clients' multi-project environments was developed and validated through literal and theoretical replication between cases. Three main types emerged as descriptive of programmes within client's construction portfolios: bounded programmes, target programmes and rolling programmes. The distinctive features of each type suggest that programme-specific approaches may be necessary for the successful delivery of projects within client's construction portfolios.
Suggested Citation
Nick Blismas & William Sher & Antony Thorpe & Andrew Baldwin, 2004.
"A typology for clients' multi-project environments,"
Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 357-371.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:22:y:2004:i:4:p:357-371
DOI: 10.1080/01446190310001649047
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:22:y:2004:i:4:p:357-371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.