Author
Abstract
Floats and critical path(s) are important issues in construction management practice. In critical path method, activities not on the critical path(s) must have float. Float measures the amount of time an activity can be delayed before it becomes critical. Consecutive repetitive activities have production rates, which may vary considerably from one activity to another. This creates a different situation (from traditional non-repetitive activities) such that repetitive activities may have rate float, in addition to time float. In this paper, a proposed model for determining different types of floats for non-serial repetitive activities is developed. The traditional concept of time float is extended to repetitive activities. Rate float, which is an inherent property of repetitive activities, is also determined. Float analysis is performed in a very similar way to Critical Path Method (CPM) analysis, without the need for graphical aids. The analysis is based on a repetitive scheduling method, which utilizes a traditional CPM network of a typical unit, in which overlapping activities are used to model repetitive activities. A constant activity production rate is assumed and resource continuity is maintained. The method for determining time floats (total and free) and the rate float of non-critical activities and of non-controlling segments of controlling activities is described in detail. The proposed model was automated by a macro-program, which has been coded on a commercial scheduling software to facilitate float determination.
Suggested Citation
Mohammad Ammar, 2003.
"Float analysis of non-serial repetitive activities,"
Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(5), pages 535-542.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:21:y:2003:i:5:p:535-542
DOI: 10.1080/0144619032000073523
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:21:y:2003:i:5:p:535-542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.