Author
Listed:
- Michael Coffey
- David Langford
Abstract
Employee participation has attracted scant attention in the construction industry, yet the experience of firms in many other industries indicate that considerable benefits in terms of improved quality, lower production costs and greater competitiveness can be achieved from formal employee participation. Studies show that there are numerous examples of employee participation, in a variety of forms, being used successfully in other industries, but none in construction- why? One possible explanation is that some fundamental aspects of the construction industry prevent the application of participation. This paper reports on research that explored whether a propensity for participation exists in the construction industry, and if so, how significant is it. The research established a conceptual model of the factors that contribute towards participation in any given workplace and established the relationship between the main variables and their constituent subvariables and subsubvariables. The model was used to determine the propensity for participation in the construction industry. The results revealed that a significant amount of informal (direct) participation already occurs in the construction industry, and a strong propensity for direct participation exists. Workers are shown to have a strong desire to participate and to have significant potential for participation in defining and controlling their everyday work (defined as the 'task'). The contextual variables of 'environment' and 'organization' are shown to be non-preventive and conducive to participation, respectively. The conclusion is that there are no inherent reasons that prevent participation being successfully applied in the construction industry.
Suggested Citation
Michael Coffey & David Langford, 1998.
"The propensity for employee participation by electrical and mechanical trades in the construction industry,"
Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 543-552.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:16:y:1998:i:5:p:543-552
DOI: 10.1080/014461998372088
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:16:y:1998:i:5:p:543-552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.