Author
Listed:
- A. Griffith
- J. D. Headley
Abstract
This paper focuses on the selection of procurement methods for small building works. While a range of procurement methods is needed to accommodate different types of small works, and procurement methods often are applied across different types, for any particular small works job (or group of jobs), there should be an optimum method of procurement. An optimum method is one that not only considers the characteristics of the small works in themselves, but also considers the impact of the works upon the wider organization and its business operations. In doing so, the small works organization is assisted to deliver an efficient effective service which adds value to the client organization. The client, to be in a position to select the method of procurement that best meets a particular type of works, needs to consider the realistic measure of performance of each of the procurement methods which it could employ. This paper proposes the use of a weighted score model as an aid to selecting procurement methods for small building works. From this paper, client organizations should become more aware of the potential to select, with reliability and consistency over time, the optimum procurement method for a particular type of small works, given those criteria which they identify as being important at the time and in consideration of not only the characteristics of the small works themselves, but the works in the context of the organization's ongoing business.
Suggested Citation
A. Griffith & J. D. Headley, 1997.
"Using a weighted score model as an aid to selecting procurement methods for small building works,"
Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 341-348.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:15:y:1997:i:4:p:341-348
DOI: 10.1080/014461997372890
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:15:y:1997:i:4:p:341-348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.