IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/comdev/v57y2026i2p249-271.html

Relationship between Master Gardeners’ and watershed stewards’ leadership skills, motivation toward engagement, and their age and education: COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Suzanna Windon
  • Olga Buchko

Abstract

This study examined the relationships between Penn State Extension Master Gardeners (MGs) and Master Watershed Stewards’ (MWSs) leadership skills, motivation toward engagement, and demographics during the COVID-19 pandemic. The target population consisted of 3,000 MGs and MWSs, and we employed a census approach for data collection. A total of 1,196 volunteers responded, yielding a 39.9% response rate. Among the top leadership skills were involving others in decision-making, building trust, giving constructive feedback, developing project plans, and facilitating meetings. Motivation toward engagement, age, and education collectively explained 12% of the variance in leadership skills. These findings underscore the importance of targeted professional development in strengthening volunteer leadership capacity. We recommend designing tailored training programs that address the specific needs of MGs and MWSs, and conducting future research to explore additional demographic and contextual factors that influence volunteers’ leadership skills.

Suggested Citation

  • Suzanna Windon & Olga Buchko, 2026. "Relationship between Master Gardeners’ and watershed stewards’ leadership skills, motivation toward engagement, and their age and education: COVID-19 pandemic," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(2), pages 249-271, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:comdev:v:57:y:2026:i:2:p:249-271
    DOI: 10.1080/15575330.2025.2581995
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15575330.2025.2581995
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15575330.2025.2581995?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:comdev:v:57:y:2026:i:2:p:249-271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCOD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.