IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/comdev/v57y2026i1p65-90.html

The dilemma of citizen participation and community development: Some empirical evidence from Cameroonian municipalities

Author

Listed:
  • Miamo Wendji Clovis
  • Pilag Kakeu Charles Bertin
  • Achuo D.Elvis

Abstract

This article examines the effects of citizen participation on community development, using data from a panel of 141 Cameroonian municipalities, collected in 2021 through a questionnaire. The results of the Tobit regression model show that, the mechanisms of citizen participation have a positive and significant influence on community development. The results also show that participatory planning tools, such as the council development plan (CDP), have a positive influence on community development. After controlling for municipality characteristics and the spatial dependence effect, using Tobit fixed effects panel estimation, our results remain robust. These results imply that, in order to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), public authorities must create the conditions for real citizen participation and public engagement at the local level. These results also contribute to the enrichment of the literature on participatory approaches in relation with stakeholder theory and community development.

Suggested Citation

  • Miamo Wendji Clovis & Pilag Kakeu Charles Bertin & Achuo D.Elvis, 2026. "The dilemma of citizen participation and community development: Some empirical evidence from Cameroonian municipalities," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(1), pages 65-90, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:comdev:v:57:y:2026:i:1:p:65-90
    DOI: 10.1080/15575330.2025.2460755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15575330.2025.2460755
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15575330.2025.2460755?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:comdev:v:57:y:2026:i:1:p:65-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCOD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.