IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/comdev/v56y2025i5p669-688.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-method research in the digital age: A methodological case study of a broad-scale rapid rural appraisal

Author

Listed:
  • Jason Entsminger
  • John J. Green
  • Renee Wiatt
  • Zuzana Bednarik

Abstract

This article presents a methodological case conceptualized de novo during the pandemic to identify priorities for investment in rural community development. To achieve project objectives, traditional research approaches were adapted to an entirely virtual setting. The project was a two-stage, mixed-methods rapid appraisal process, with data analyzed using the Community Capitals Framework. First, an online survey was conducted, collecting responses from rural community development practitioners across the U.S. Second, quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted to identify rural development priority areas. Results were used to design and facilitate virtual dialogue sessions with key informants to inventory assets, challenges, and opportunities in rural communities. Dialogue outcomes contributed to identifying priority areas for national and regional investments in rural development. This article opens dialogue within the field on community-engaged research in the digital age. Lessons learned include challenges of institutional trust, broadband access, and methodological modifications to accommodate virtual settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Jason Entsminger & John J. Green & Renee Wiatt & Zuzana Bednarik, 2025. "Multi-method research in the digital age: A methodological case study of a broad-scale rapid rural appraisal," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(5), pages 669-688, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:comdev:v:56:y:2025:i:5:p:669-688
    DOI: 10.1080/15575330.2024.2438011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15575330.2024.2438011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15575330.2024.2438011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:comdev:v:56:y:2025:i:5:p:669-688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCOD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.