IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/comdev/v56y2025i3p394-406.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anti-Domestic Violence Training for Hairstylists in Black Communities: A Policy Feasibility Study

Author

Listed:
  • Stephenie Howard

Abstract

This paper reports on the findings of a policy feasibility study. The study examined the feasibility of mandatory anti-domestic violence training legislation for Black communities in Virginia. The study used a mixed-method approach, incorporating surveys of 33 hairstylists and interviews with three key stakeholders. The results revealed that hairstylists are receptive to anti-domestic violence training and perceive themselves as valuable resources for addressing domestic violence. However, participants cautioned against making training compulsory. The study also found that Virginia legislators would likely support mandating anti-domestic violence training for hair professionals. The study concludes that there is value in adopting incentivized and easily accessible anti-domestic violence training laws for Virginia hair professionals. This study presents numerous implications, such as the need for further research to explore the impact of engaging hairstylists and other community leaders in domestic violence intervention efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephenie Howard, 2025. "Anti-Domestic Violence Training for Hairstylists in Black Communities: A Policy Feasibility Study," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(3), pages 394-406, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:comdev:v:56:y:2025:i:3:p:394-406
    DOI: 10.1080/15575330.2024.2438027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15575330.2024.2438027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15575330.2024.2438027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:comdev:v:56:y:2025:i:3:p:394-406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCOD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.