IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/comdev/v49y2018i4p415-431.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of community activity on the personal resources of low-SES residents: Differences between activists and non-activists

Author

Listed:
  • Lea Zanbar

Abstract

Community social work interventions enable low-SES residents to improve their situation themselves by becoming community activists who design and implement social plans, rather than being passive recipients of welfare services. In addition to aiding themselves and their communities, involvement in this meaningful activity may also enhance the personal resources of activists. Using MANCOVA analyses, the current study compared the levels of seven personal resources, categorized in the literature as capability resources (self-efficacy, self-esteem, mastery, self-actualization) and hardiness resources (resilience, wellbeing, hope), among 200 community activists and 200 non-activists in low-SES communities. The findings reveal significantly higher levels of almost all resources among the activists. Furthermore, regression analyses indicated the significant effect of the activists’ years of involvement in community activity and the centrality of the role performed on their personal resources, suggesting that activists’ resources are indeed strengthened by their work for the community. The implications for researchers and community social workers are discussed, and practical recommendations are offered.

Suggested Citation

  • Lea Zanbar, 2018. "The impact of community activity on the personal resources of low-SES residents: Differences between activists and non-activists," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 415-431, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:comdev:v:49:y:2018:i:4:p:415-431
    DOI: 10.1080/15575330.2018.1494205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15575330.2018.1494205
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15575330.2018.1494205?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:comdev:v:49:y:2018:i:4:p:415-431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCOD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.