IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/comdev/v46y2015i1p14-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality of participation in community groups in Kamuli District, Uganda: implications for policy and practice

Author

Listed:
  • Haroon Sseguya
  • Robert E. Mazur
  • Betty Wells
  • Frank Matsiko

Abstract

Development interventions increasingly support active participation of community members especially through community-level groups. This article explores the quality of participation in community groups in a rural setting in Uganda, focusing on how members participate and the factors that facilitate or impede their participation. Data sources included 20 in-depth group interviews and related documentary evidence. Findings indicate that members participate best in groups where material benefits and capacity building opportunities are realized, and that groups successful in achieving project objectives tend to establish networks with other stakeholders. Low trust in leadership and unsuitable leadership styles inhibit participation quality. Based on these findings, the authors recommend that development programs work with community groups to identify and address capacity gaps, support establishment of networks with other stakeholders, and pursue strategies to institutionalize and sustain changes derived from program interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Haroon Sseguya & Robert E. Mazur & Betty Wells & Frank Matsiko, 2015. "Quality of participation in community groups in Kamuli District, Uganda: implications for policy and practice," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(1), pages 14-25, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:comdev:v:46:y:2015:i:1:p:14-25
    DOI: 10.1080/15575330.2014.971036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15575330.2014.971036
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15575330.2014.971036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. B. K. Downie & P. Dearden & L. King, 2018. "Exploring paradoxes in the search for sustainable livelihoods: a case study from Tanzania," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 527-542, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:comdev:v:46:y:2015:i:1:p:14-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCOD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.