IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cnpexx/v30y2025i5p729-740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disrupting the production boundary: from deservingness to right

Author

Listed:
  • Emma J. Kast

Abstract

The link between productive economic activity and deservingness of remuneration is taken for granted in modern economic thought. While heterodox traditions within international political economy (IPE) emphasise the global division of labour and therefore a de-individualised understanding of value production, they remain committed to a production boundary, or a sharp distinction between productive and unproductive economic activities. Accompanying this understanding is a productivist notion of deservingness: the belief that productive activities are directly deserving of reward or remuneration, while unproductive activities are considered undeserving. But what are the consequences of conflating value production with entitlement to wealth? Engaging with Mariana Mazzucato's influential work on value, I address how the notion of the production boundary fails to capture the flow of labour and capital, as well the temporal elements of past, present, and future, which all contribute to how value is determined in a dynamic capitalist world economy. Ultimately, what is at stake is to challenge the notion that a production boundary is necessary for a conception of economic justice. The paper is therefore interested in possibilities for moving beyond deservingness and towards a democratisation of wealth based on need and the notion of economic rights.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma J. Kast, 2025. "Disrupting the production boundary: from deservingness to right," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 729-740, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cnpexx:v:30:y:2025:i:5:p:729-740
    DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2025.2487447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13563467.2025.2487447
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13563467.2025.2487447?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cnpexx:v:30:y:2025:i:5:p:729-740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cnpe20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.