IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cnpexx/v30y2025i5p652-665.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A less reluctant (green) Atlas? Explaining the People’s Bank of China’s distinctive environmental shift

Author

Listed:
  • Monica DiLeo
  • Eric Helleiner
  • Hongying Wang

Abstract

Why did the Chinese central bank embrace environmental policies earlier than Western central banks and with a consistent focus on a wider range of environmental issues and more ambitious promotional policies? Although the greening of central banks has attracted growing attention from scholars of political economy, this distinctive and pioneering role of the People’s Bank of China has received less attention than that of Western central banks. It can partly be explained by the Chinese central bank’s historically-rooted ‘developmental’ institutional features, namely its wider mandate, lack of political independence, and its more activist policy tools. But this institutionalist explanation also needs to be complemented by a more agency-centered one that examines the catalytic role of Chinese political authorities and financial technocrats, with their particular priorities and ideas. The analysis contributes to political economy literature on the emergence of green central banking by exploring the less-studied Chinese case and offering an analytical framework that encourages comparative study of this phenomenon beyond the Western context.

Suggested Citation

  • Monica DiLeo & Eric Helleiner & Hongying Wang, 2025. "A less reluctant (green) Atlas? Explaining the People’s Bank of China’s distinctive environmental shift," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 652-665, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cnpexx:v:30:y:2025:i:5:p:652-665
    DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2025.2504391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13563467.2025.2504391
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13563467.2025.2504391?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cnpexx:v:30:y:2025:i:5:p:652-665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cnpe20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.