IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cnpexx/v30y2025i4p481-493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The public interest requirement in quiet business politics and noisy business politics – evidence from Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Bell

Abstract

Using interview material from senior government relations executives in large firms in Australia and other sources, this paper argues for the need to bring the ‘public back in’ to improve our understanding of business government relations in terms of business influence and power. It argues that the role of the public and policy-relevant notions of the public interest can often play a central role here. This is important in ‘noisy’ business politics where voters and the public can be decisive in either supporting or constraining business. Moreover, even in ‘quiet’ business politics away from the immediate public gaze, and contrary to existing theory, the paper argues that business must be attentive to public interest agendas if its quiet lobbying is to appeal to government electoral incentives and be successful. Hence, in both arenas business has strong incentives to be attentive to what might be called the ‘public interest requirement’ or the PIR.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Bell, 2025. "The public interest requirement in quiet business politics and noisy business politics – evidence from Australia," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 481-493, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cnpexx:v:30:y:2025:i:4:p:481-493
    DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2024.2446191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13563467.2024.2446191
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13563467.2024.2446191?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cnpexx:v:30:y:2025:i:4:p:481-493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cnpe20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.