IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cnpexx/v30y2025i2p300-312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking predation under financialisation through the history of subprime mortgages: a case of raiding finance

Author

Listed:
  • Pasquale Emanuele De Girolamo

Abstract

The ‘rentier’ model provides an influential framework for conceptualising the predatory traits of financialisation. It asserts that financialisation has empowered a class of rentiers who wield influence by controlling scarce money and charging others for its use. The development of subprime mortgages is often cited as a prime example of rentier exploitation, wherein banks capitalised on historically marginalised borrowers. This article revisits this history to argue that predation under financialisation has historically deviated from rentierisation. Specifically, subprime mortgages were not developed by entities fitting the rentier model, but rather by real estate actors operating outside the established financial system. The latter developed predatory capabilities by virtue of their ability to secure substantial funds through debt, thus reducing reliance on their own capital. This led to the creation of subprime mortgages, loans focused on home-equity stripping, which were crucial to sustain their funding model. Building on these insights, this study introduces the concept of ‘raiding’ as a form of predation that emphasises practices centred on the rapid extraction of money, alongside more traditional forms of rentierism.

Suggested Citation

  • Pasquale Emanuele De Girolamo, 2025. "Rethinking predation under financialisation through the history of subprime mortgages: a case of raiding finance," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 300-312, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cnpexx:v:30:y:2025:i:2:p:300-312
    DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2024.2434482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13563467.2024.2434482
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13563467.2024.2434482?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cnpexx:v:30:y:2025:i:2:p:300-312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cnpe20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.