IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/clarxx/v51y2026i1p149-167.html

Enclosing urban green spaces. The fences of Finsbury Park

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Smith
  • Didem Ertem
  • Goran Vodicka

Abstract

Fences are one of the defining features of public parks, particularly in England. In other parts of the world, fences have been removed or lowered to make parks more open and accessible. But many park authorities in England have retained perimeter fencing, as they feel it protects people and environments. In this paper, we evaluate justifications for, and attitudes towards, fences; and evaluate how they affect park users, park activities and park inclusivity. We explore specific issues associated with fencing, but also analyse fences to better understand the parklands they delineate. This is achieved by analysing different types of fencing – perimeter and internal, temporary and permanent – in Finsbury Park, north London. Our research found that the priority for users is upgrading perimeter fencing, rather than removing it. Internal enclosures are not seen as a major problem either, although the temporary barriers erected to secure major events are.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Smith & Didem Ertem & Goran Vodicka, 2026. "Enclosing urban green spaces. The fences of Finsbury Park," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(1), pages 149-167, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:clarxx:v:51:y:2026:i:1:p:149-167
    DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2025.2516015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01426397.2025.2516015
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01426397.2025.2516015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:clarxx:v:51:y:2026:i:1:p:149-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/clar20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.