IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/clarxx/v50y2025i4p731-745.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collaborative design of landscape and lighting to improve visitors’ satisfaction with nightscapes

Author

Listed:
  • Jingwei Zhao
  • Shuhui Deng
  • Bingru Sha
  • Shiqi Wang

Abstract

Visitors’ satisfaction with the nightscapes of urban green spaces is currently poorly understood, with existing literature mainly focusing on visitors’ satisfaction with daytime landscapes. Moreover, the collaborative design of landscape and lighting—two important factors determining satisfaction—remains unclear. This study conducted surveys on visitors’ satisfaction with nightscapes through a comparative assessment referring to the Federation Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) World Cup Rules. Statistical analysis revealed that: (1) more open spaces, rich colours, and a higher brightness could improve visitors’ satisfaction with nightscapes, while dazzle lighting reduced it; (2) brightness was conducive to visitors’ satisfaction, while enhancing brightness reduced the capacity of a nightscape to uniformly support the four components of satisfaction; and (3) increasing vegetation coverage could enhance this capacity. These findings provide reliable evidence to guide collaborative design that simultaneously considers landscape characteristics and lighting features, which facilitates the improvement of visitors’ satisfaction with nightscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingwei Zhao & Shuhui Deng & Bingru Sha & Shiqi Wang, 2025. "Collaborative design of landscape and lighting to improve visitors’ satisfaction with nightscapes," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(4), pages 731-745, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:clarxx:v:50:y:2025:i:4:p:731-745
    DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2025.2453120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01426397.2025.2453120
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01426397.2025.2453120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:clarxx:v:50:y:2025:i:4:p:731-745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/clar20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.