IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/clarxx/v50y2025i4p565-579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A geospatial approach to landscape gaze using social media to evaluate how people value landscapes in an urban context

Author

Listed:
  • Riley Bibaud
  • Eva McGrath
  • Zoe Sydenham
  • Richard Yarwood
  • Tom Mullier
  • Siân Rees

Abstract

Urban park management generally prioritises green spaces and activities within park boundaries, rather than landscape interactions. Understanding how people experience and connect with broader landscapes is essential for improving societal environmental, economic and wellbeing outcomes. A geospatial and discourse analysis of three urban parks was conducted in Plymouth, UK. The predominant landscape gaze at each park revealed strong social ties to blue spaces – namely the coast and sea – indicating an interconnectedness between parks and coastal spaces beyond park boundaries. Textual analysis emphasised the beauty of nature, the expanse of the ocean, and the health and wellbeing benefits of blue and green spaces. These findings suggest that where there is a geographical intersection, experiences cannot be separated. Consideration should therefore be given to the ways that blue and green space combine to shape the landscape gaze and the significance both within, and beyond, the boundaries of urban parks.

Suggested Citation

  • Riley Bibaud & Eva McGrath & Zoe Sydenham & Richard Yarwood & Tom Mullier & Siân Rees, 2025. "A geospatial approach to landscape gaze using social media to evaluate how people value landscapes in an urban context," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(4), pages 565-579, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:clarxx:v:50:y:2025:i:4:p:565-579
    DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2024.2410904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01426397.2024.2410904
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01426397.2024.2410904?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:clarxx:v:50:y:2025:i:4:p:565-579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/clar20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.