IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/clarxx/v42y2017i5p533-542.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of neighbourhood on rodent communities: an example from Pampean agroecosystems

Author

Listed:
  • Jimena Fraschina
  • Vanina A. León
  • María Busch

Abstract

Pampean region agroecosystems are devoted to agricultural and farming activities, but in the crop field matrix there are relicts of remnant natural habitats. Poultry farms mainly harbour commensal species as house mice and rats, which are rarely present in surrounding habitats. We assessed if neighbourhood to poultry farms affect the presence of Mus musculus in crop fields and their borders, and if rodent community in poultry farms is influenced by the species present in surrounding crop fields and borders. We found that habitat had a significant effect on the abundance of M. musculus. This species showed higher abundance in poultry farms than in crop field borders. Calomys laucha was the unique native species that was captured in farm sheds. We found higher abundance of native species in crop field borders than in crop fields independent of the proximity to the poultry farms. We conclude that rodent communities in poultry farms are little influenced by the surroundings, and show a dominance of M. musculus independently of the presence of native rodent species in neighbour habitats. On the other hand, farms do not export M. musculus to surrounding habitats, and borders only function as corridors for dispersal among farms, while crop fields are rarely used.

Suggested Citation

  • Jimena Fraschina & Vanina A. León & María Busch, 2017. "The effect of neighbourhood on rodent communities: an example from Pampean agroecosystems," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(5), pages 533-542, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:clarxx:v:42:y:2017:i:5:p:533-542
    DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2017.1291924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01426397.2017.1291924
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01426397.2017.1291924?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:clarxx:v:42:y:2017:i:5:p:533-542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/clar20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.