IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/clarxx/v42y2017i5p471-481.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Once in demand, now unwanted: reflections on changed attitudes towards plants introduced to Norway 1750–1900

Author

Listed:
  • Ulrika Ridbäck
  • Annegreth Dietze-Schirdewahn

Abstract

Among plant species introduced to Norway, several are naturalising and spreading in the landscape in an aggressive way. There is an ongoing debate between professionals in nature management and cultural heritage. Policy-makers have selected the year 1800 as a time delimitation: the use of plant species introduced later is to be regulated or even forbidden. Looking back in history, the perception of the introduction of plants between 1750 and 1900 differs from present attitudes. Introduced plants were once regarded as positive contributions that could be used to demonstrate botanic skills and wealth, as well as garden owners’ skills in cultivating them. At present, many of the plant species that were once desirable are now regarded as threatening ‘aliens’. This article examines changed attitudes towards introduced plants, with an emphasis on the period 1750–1900, when the majority of new plants arrived.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulrika Ridbäck & Annegreth Dietze-Schirdewahn, 2017. "Once in demand, now unwanted: reflections on changed attitudes towards plants introduced to Norway 1750–1900," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(5), pages 471-481, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:clarxx:v:42:y:2017:i:5:p:471-481
    DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2016.1267720
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01426397.2016.1267720
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01426397.2016.1267720?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:clarxx:v:42:y:2017:i:5:p:471-481. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/clar20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.