IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/clarxx/v41y2016i8p838-852.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sheep grazing in ‘lawnscape’ management: an emissions comparison with conventional ‘lawnscape’ management

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Alexander Lenaghan

Abstract

The use of sheep in lawnscape management is touted as a low-carbon alternative to conventional lawnscaping; however this claim remains unsubstantiated. While conventional lawnscaping generates greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, primarily through fuel combustion, sheep grazing produces methane (CH4) as well as manure which releases embodied nitrogen as nitrous oxide (N2O) as it degrades. These gases have a carbon equivalency of 25 and 298 respectively, indicating their much greater potency as GHGs relative to carbon dioxide (CO2). This paper is the first to critically profile and compare GHG emissions produced by grazing and conventional lawnscape management. It discusses critical factors affecting the carbon footprint of both practices, and develops a framework for evaluating lawnscape management emissions. This study finds that replacing lawnmowers and the treatment and application of compost with a grazing regime can reduce net lawnscape management emissions by 34–37%, or 980 kgCO2e/ha/year.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Alexander Lenaghan, 2016. "Sheep grazing in ‘lawnscape’ management: an emissions comparison with conventional ‘lawnscape’ management," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(8), pages 838-852, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:clarxx:v:41:y:2016:i:8:p:838-852
    DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2016.1234033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01426397.2016.1234033
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01426397.2016.1234033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:clarxx:v:41:y:2016:i:8:p:838-852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/clar20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.