IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/clarxx/v40y2015i3p318-337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Indigenous Landscape Classification across Different Dimensions: A Case Study from the Bolivian Amazon

Author

Listed:
  • Carles Riu-Bosoms
  • Teresa Vidal
  • Andrea Duane
  • Alvaro Fernandez-Llamazares Onrubia
  • Maximilien Gueze
  • Ana C. Luz
  • Jaime Paneque-Gálvez
  • Manuel J. Macia
  • Victoria Reyes-Garcia

Abstract

Decisions on landscape management are often dictated by government officials based on their own understandings of how landscape should be used and managed, but rarely considering local peoples' understandings of the landscape they inhabit. We use data collected through free listings, field transects and interviews to describe how an Amazonian group of hunter-horticulturalists, the Tsimane', classify and perceive the importance of different elements of the landscape across the ecological, socioeconomic, and spiritual dimensions. The Tsimane' recognise nine folk ecotopes (i.e. culturally recognised landscape units) and use a variety of criteria (including geomorphological features and landscape uses) to differentiate ecotopes from one another. The Tsimane' rank different folk ecotopes in accordance with their perceived ecological, socioeconomic, and spiritual importance. Understanding how local people perceive their landscape contributes towards a landscape management planning paradigm that acknowledges the continuing contributions to management of landscape by its inhabitants, as well as their cultural and land use rights.

Suggested Citation

  • Carles Riu-Bosoms & Teresa Vidal & Andrea Duane & Alvaro Fernandez-Llamazares Onrubia & Maximilien Gueze & Ana C. Luz & Jaime Paneque-Gálvez & Manuel J. Macia & Victoria Reyes-Garcia, 2015. "Exploring Indigenous Landscape Classification across Different Dimensions: A Case Study from the Bolivian Amazon," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 318-337, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:clarxx:v:40:y:2015:i:3:p:318-337
    DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2013.829810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01426397.2013.829810
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:clarxx:v:40:y:2015:i:3:p:318-337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/clar20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.