Author
Listed:
- Luke Bates
- P. Saskia Bayerl
- Babak Akhgar
Abstract
Solutions to public space surveillance typically involve the use of progressively advanced technologies, deployed at locations such as cities, neighborhoods, or public transportation hubs. These surveillance technologies are increasingly beginning to use artificial intelligence (AI), and consequently it is a priority for governments and policymakers to consider the effects of the widespread use of these AI-powered surveillance systems for society. However, not enough is currently known about the aspect of societal acceptance for this increased surveillance or the factors that are related to it. Therefore, this study aims to inform the direction of future research into this topic through a systematic review, being the only one to address this particular subject that the authors are aware of, and consequently filling a crucial gap in the literature that can help guide policymakers and practitioners in considering the factors that will first need to be addressed in order to gain the acceptance of citizens and successfully integrate these systems of surveillance into society’s urban spaces. The present study reviews the available literature on this topic. A date range of 2015 onwards was set, resulting in the inclusion of a total of 50 different studies. Citizen acceptance was found to be related to the location of surveillance, the surveillance technology, citizens’ country, individual factors, and perceived barriers, including the trade-off between privacy and security, the effectiveness of the surveillance system, and issues of trust and legitimacy.
Suggested Citation
Luke Bates & P. Saskia Bayerl & Babak Akhgar, 2025.
"Which Factors Affect Acceptance of Public Space Surveillance? A Systematic Literature Review,"
Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 193-212, May.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:cjutxx:v:32:y:2025:i:3:p:193-212
DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2025.2466103
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjutxx:v:32:y:2025:i:3:p:193-212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjut20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.