Author
Listed:
- Cem Ataman
- Simon Perrault
- Bige Tunçer
Abstract
Digital citizen participation tools revolutionize how residents engage with urban issues, enabling unprecedented levels of collective discourse and large-scale involvement. These tools are essential for advancing urban design and planning through individual and asynchronous contributions. However, their inherent complexity often poses significant challenges for users. To mitigate this, developers and practitioners equip these platforms with user instructions aimed at simplifying navigation. Despite these efforts, the strategies for communicating the functionality and objectives of these tools, as well as their impact on participation processes, are not well understood. Accordingly, this study investigates the influence of different types of user instructions—descriptive versus non-descriptive—on users’ perceived reliability of digital participation platforms. Conducted in three phases—pre-participation, participation, and post-participation—the research involved modifying a digital tool and testing it with 47 university students engaged in a campus transformation project in Singapore using the Consul Project digital platform. The evaluation, carried out through surveys and semi-structured interviews in the post-participation phase, reveals that well-crafted descriptive instructions, which contain clear objectives, step-by-step guidance, and contextual information, significantly boost participants’ trust and engagement levels. Consequently, our findings underscore the importance of carefully designed user instructions in enhancing the effectiveness of digital citizen participation in urban design and planning.
Suggested Citation
Cem Ataman & Simon Perrault & Bige Tunçer, 2024.
"Fostering Inclusive Urban Design and Planning: Enhanced Trust and Reliability through Descriptive Instructions for Digital Citizen Participation,"
Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4-5), pages 25-48, October.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:cjutxx:v:31:y:2024:i:4-5:p:25-48
DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2024.2421729
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjutxx:v:31:y:2024:i:4-5:p:25-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjut20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.